Domino.Doc versus Quickr
Category
Tomorrow, for the first time in years, I have to demo Domino.Doc on a customer site. I only do this because a *cough* large *cough* consultancy firm recommended this product to the customer as it would fit their needs. After a few phone calls with the customer, I talked about a native domino solution, or Quickr, and the customer agrees that they want to look at these, but also need to see Domino.Doc as this was the recommended product.
As far as I know, Domino.Doc went on a level of maintenance mode a number (5?) years ago. I know there have been a few updates, and support is there for for Domino 7.0.x but its more or less out to pasture.
Historically I liked Domino.Doc as long as you didn't screw with it. If you tried to change anything serious about the product, or its core code, it would bite you... hard, before barfing over itself and exploding. That, in some ways reminds me of Quickr now.
But, for the younger generation (Christ, I'm getting old) Domino.Doc did have some excellent features. It was a document management product, that had all sorts of security, folders (binders), libraries, templates, check-in/check-out features. It even had an offline mode and the ability to replicate among multiple servers. Its browser interface, is dated by today's standards...

Quickr sure as hell looks better in some areas, but Domino.Doc also had a few tricks up its sleeve...
Native Notes access
You could go into, and work with libraries (databases) containing documents through the Notes client, and the browser, as well as connectors. Quickr is just for browser and connectors.
Speaking of connectors, it had built in ODMA featuring a WAY more intuitive interface for MS office users then Quickr. Lets look at the Domino.Doc one interface with MS Office when you save a document:
Compare that to the Lotus Quickr plug-in tool in MS Office today.

Even the windows explorer connector was comparable. And this software is at this stage, officially old. I even know of a few sites that are refusing to let the product go from their domain, citing it over Sharepoint, due to the Notes integration, and over Quickr. If Domino.Doc received the investment it possibly deserved in the past, and QuickPlace never came on stream (or was just integrated into Domino.Doc), would both products combined been better? Now I have Quickr competing against a Lotus product from the past, as well as Notes itself, as well as IBM Content Manager if I got picky (Filenet - not really... that's just for massive scale). Then Sharepoint. So products in the IBM family are competing with each other, with limited people knowing about them all... and MS have a simple Sharepoint message... which I know is horseshit when you consider the mish mash that makes that turd fly.... but the buyers are never told it. MS have a "simple" single message in that area. Lotus are fighting ghosts from the past and cousins alive today.
With the great news on Ed's promotion, hopefully some product streamlining will come about in this space...
Tomorrow, for the first time in years, I have to demo Domino.Doc on a customer site. I only do this because a *cough* large *cough* consultancy firm recommended this product to the customer as it would fit their needs. After a few phone calls with the customer, I talked about a native domino solution, or Quickr, and the customer agrees that they want to look at these, but also need to see Domino.Doc as this was the recommended product.
As far as I know, Domino.Doc went on a level of maintenance mode a number (5?) years ago. I know there have been a few updates, and support is there for for Domino 7.0.x but its more or less out to pasture.
Historically I liked Domino.Doc as long as you didn't screw with it. If you tried to change anything serious about the product, or its core code, it would bite you... hard, before barfing over itself and exploding. That, in some ways reminds me of Quickr now.
But, for the younger generation (Christ, I'm getting old) Domino.Doc did have some excellent features. It was a document management product, that had all sorts of security, folders (binders), libraries, templates, check-in/check-out features. It even had an offline mode and the ability to replicate among multiple servers. Its browser interface, is dated by today's standards...
Quickr sure as hell looks better in some areas, but Domino.Doc also had a few tricks up its sleeve...
Native Notes access
You could go into, and work with libraries (databases) containing documents through the Notes client, and the browser, as well as connectors. Quickr is just for browser and connectors.
Speaking of connectors, it had built in ODMA featuring a WAY more intuitive interface for MS office users then Quickr. Lets look at the Domino.Doc one interface with MS Office when you save a document:
Compare that to the Lotus Quickr plug-in tool in MS Office today.
Even the windows explorer connector was comparable. And this software is at this stage, officially old. I even know of a few sites that are refusing to let the product go from their domain, citing it over Sharepoint, due to the Notes integration, and over Quickr. If Domino.Doc received the investment it possibly deserved in the past, and QuickPlace never came on stream (or was just integrated into Domino.Doc), would both products combined been better? Now I have Quickr competing against a Lotus product from the past, as well as Notes itself, as well as IBM Content Manager if I got picky (Filenet - not really... that's just for massive scale). Then Sharepoint. So products in the IBM family are competing with each other, with limited people knowing about them all... and MS have a simple Sharepoint message... which I know is horseshit when you consider the mish mash that makes that turd fly.... but the buyers are never told it. MS have a "simple" single message in that area. Lotus are fighting ghosts from the past and cousins alive today.
With the great news on Ed's promotion, hopefully some product streamlining will come about in this space...
- 



Comments
But it's also incredibly powerful.
It just reeks of wasted opportunity every time I see it...
*sighs*
Posted by Philip Storry At 23:57:56 On 06/10/2008 | - Website - |
Document Manager stopped with Release 7.0x and ONLY was last certified to 7.0.2 fp2 I believe.
The ODMA connectors WILL NOT WORK under Office 2007, DO NOT ATTEMPT IT.
You will hose your configuration.
Also it is picky with Vista(I use Vista on my laptop) so those being said...
I still like Doc and have done some tinkering with it as the # of people that handle it are less than 5 worldwide evidently based on my last few postings in the forums and other places.
A roadmap for Doc was issued at LS08 which included some point releases to get it to R8 and possibly Vista and Office 2007. Ideally they wanted to port the Quickr COnnectors to Doc, that hasn't happenned yet. See Jelan heidelberg if you need urgent details.
At least you don't have to demo it in a foriegn language like I have in the past.
Posted by Keith Brooks At 00:59:05 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
There are a few of us left who dig it so, I'll just join Phil in the sighs!
Posted by Tim Lorge At 02:22:31 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
I haven't followed it much since, but saw it being renamed a couple times and I thought the Domino Document Manager was still being updated
They need to combine the last couple features they don't have in Quickr from D.Doc and marked it appropriately - Ed? Can do you just write blogs, or do you also read blogs? Esp Irish ones? :)
Michael
Posted by Michael Kobrowski At 02:46:42 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Kevin Pettitt At 03:50:08 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
@4 - You would be surprised how many sites Ed reads.
Posted by Paul Mooney At 06:41:14 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Elaine At 10:42:03 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Wannes Rams At 12:50:30 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
The thought crossed my mind to go outside of IBM, and do just that as a pseudo business partner. However, I just don't think it'd be a wise move. The product is quite old, and I'm not sure how many customers would want to use it if a third party was providing all the updates.
Posted by Anonymous DomDoc Dev At 18:56:40 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Ed Brill At 21:09:14 On 07/10/2008 | - Website - |
Domino.doc is that tool that all that has used it has hated it (at least a little bit).
If you look for technical information in the Internet, there is nothing new from years ago. This is a little bit frustating.
Nevertheless there are a lot of people who is using this tool daily and they cannot live without it.
Part of my job is Documental solutions offering, with Documentum, Domino.doc... and Dom.doc has its own defined niche and it's difficult to compete against it in that niche.
The only thing I hope is that migration to Quickr will be planned by IBM as easy as possible.
I have had used Quickr in Lotusgrenhouse and as it looks like, in part as Domino.doc, I think it's a good entry point for a lot of people to get introduced to the Web 2.0 applications. Believe me, there are a lot of people they don't know what is this and they work in our companies.
Regards
Posted by joapen At 08:50:13 On 08/10/2008 | - Website - |
Quickr is great for small teams/depts, but is not really up to larger document management, and despite the interface DDM is is some ways easier to use.. (versioning for example)
Ohh and the attache case is great, especially for law firms who need to take documents into court.
I also like the fact that DDM has simple Lotuscript integration points Query Checkin / Out, Review etc. It makes it childs play to integrate into you Notes/Domino applications.
Quickr is not as easy to customise at times as I have not found a simple way to intercept check in through all interfaces...
I think that there could be a place for both applications, many companies want to stick with the Domino platform, but seem to be finding Quickr not up to the job of traditional document management, and cant go for DDM as IBM is not making any commitment to it...
It would not take much to turn DDM into a top notch document management system, esp if you could leverage the DB2 back end of Domino 8, it does make a great value document management system.
Posted by Neil At 01:13:01 On 10/10/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Gary Walsh At 12:22:08 On 13/11/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Kerr At 13:03:10 On 13/11/2008 | - Website - |